The Gift versus The Curse
My most recent post, The Curse That Keeps On Giving, has elicited quite a reaction from A.D.D.ers. The very first reaction was an attack. In a private email an A.D.D.er eloquently wrote:
here’s a suggestion — which I doubt you will take since you love to be miserable on your pity pot — try changing your thinking and you might just change your brain
but you won’t do that because you like thinking that you are damaged goods
tough shit
I must admit that this email worried me. I expected a flood of attacks. However, this was the only attack. I’ve received many comments and emails that were encouraging. Here are a few quotes.
Thank you thank you thank you. I rant about this all the time.
ADHD is a gift like my depression is a gift. Both of them make living life the way I want and doing the work I love [...] extremely difficult.
Calling ADHD a gift is insulting to ambitious, intelligent people who experience ADHD as a severe impediment to reaching their goals.
Bravo! I’m tired of the “gift” theme, too.
Based on the emails and public comments, this highly non-scientific survey leads me to the conclusion that more people see A.D.D. as a curse than as a gift. Unfortunately the dichotomy is not that clear cut. A.D.D. is, it seems, BOTH a gift and a curse. As a gift it can be the source of great insight and creativity and more.1 But the gift is wrapped in an unbreakable membrane that is composed of forgetfulness and distractibility and forty other undesirable characteristics. While it is possible to unwrap the gift of A.D.D. and enjoy what’s inside, the “unwrapping” is momentary. The wrapping paper eventually snaps back, rewrapping the “gift” with that unbreakable membrane. A.D.D. is the gift that won’t stay unwrapped.
A.D.D. Digression: For a disgustingly cheap, deceptive and unrealistic view of “A.D.D. as a Gift,” See: Unwrapping the Gift of ADD. Spearheaded by two well-known authorities in the field, they have reduced themselves to circus ringmasters in charge of a circus side-show. Some of the side-show characters are very well known for their work and, I feel, should be ashamed to lend their good names to this farcical affair. I am sure that the ringmasters’ intentions were good. However they have “wrapped” their message in nearly every misleading sales technique imaginable. “Yes! A $47 value! But wait…there’s more! Operators are standing by! Money Back Guarantee!” Quite surprisingly they do not (yet) offer a free Veg-a-Matic. I’m sure that that’s an oversight that will soon be rectified.
One of my dedicated readers pointed out to me that the “gift versus curse” dichotomy is a distraction from the real problem, namely, the need to deal with the constellation of symptoms that constitute A.D.D. There is something to be said for this approach. Dispensing with the dichotomy (and its debate) would take A.D.D. out of the realm of value judgment (gift? curse?) and, in essence, neutralize the debate. However, while this makes sense from the practical aspect of how to deal with A.D.D.’s symptoms (it is a set of symptoms to be treated), the debate is still useful for A.D.D.ers.
A.D.D., for an A.D.D.er, is not lived as a collection of symptoms but as deep, complex actions, thoughts, values and physical effects, that are experienced over time through a human body that exists in space. From the outside we may exhibit forgetfulness but from the inside, that is, as experienced by the A.D.D.er, forgetfulness may carry with it a visceral panic combined with a sinking doubt that is felt in the gut. The mind races around looking for a clue to grab on to to help remember what has been forgotten and that sinking feeling worsens as you mentally and sometimes physically double over. Forgetfulness is experienced as an inseparable mental and physical phenomenon.2
The value of the gift/curse dichotomy is that it helps the A.D.D.er know how to behave towards and in light of the symptoms that are lived from moment to moment. It defines, in a sense, a stance the A.D.D.er takes vis-a-vis the A.D.D. As my eloquent critic put it, change your thinking and you might change your brain. See it as a gift and you see positive aspects. See it as a curse and you’ll be burdened with the negative aspects.
Admittedly the stance of the blind optimist who sees only the positive is an unrealistic and potentially doomed approach.3 To be blind to the negativity of A.D.D. is to set yourself up for profound disappointment. You cannot keep the negative at bay for too long. However, to sit on one’s “pity pot” and focus on the negative is to be dragged into the hell of despair.
I believe the correct stance is one that occupies a middle ground, a nuanced gray area that considers the multidimensionality of the human experience and avoids black/white dichotomies. It is a stance that takes a positive tack while keeping in mind that an ill wind can blow through at any time. When the winds of negativity are in control, you regain control by remembering that this is not a permanent condition. You can adjust your sails. You can search for that “positive” breeze and, if you fail, remember that in time it will blow over and the positive will come through again.
[Image Source: Google Image Search Results]

- Note, however, that some A.D.D.ers do not seem to have the “wonderful gift” qualities of A.D.D. That brings, for them, a different type of anguish.↩
- Admittedly I’m using a mind-body dualism here but while such a separation may not exist ontologically, nonetheless, the dualism exists experientially for human beings. Also, see The A.D.D. Memory Panic.↩
- This has been the major thrust of ADDer World and was the original impetus for my short-lived screed. However, a most recent post shows a bit of subtlety and nuance on the part of Hutchinson. See The Gift – The Curse – The Brilliant Reality of ADHD.↩









